Corrigan v. Rowland
205 A.2d 787, 152 Conn. 738
This text of 205 A.2d 787 (Corrigan v. Rowland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Corrigan v. Rowland, 205 A.2d 787, 152 Conn. 738 (Colo. 1965).
Opinion
The motion by the defendants Clinton H. Rowland and the city of Hartford to dismiss the appeal of the defendant Mary A. Moriarty from the Superior Court in Hartford County insofar as it is or may be directed against them is granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
205 A.2d 787, 152 Conn. 738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corrigan-v-rowland-conn-1965.