Corrigan v. Morris

97 Mo. 174
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedOctober 15, 1888
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 97 Mo. 174 (Corrigan v. Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Corrigan v. Morris, 97 Mo. 174 (Mo. 1888).

Opinion

Brace, J.

The respondent brought suit against the appellants, to which the county of Jackson was made a party defendant, to enforce the lien of two special tax-bills, issued by the City of Kansas, on a certain lot in said city, for the improvement of a certain street therein. Judgment was obtained against all the defendants in that suit, a transcript thereof filed in the office of the clerk of the circuit court of Jackson county [175]*175and an execution issued thereon. The appellants then filed a motion in the circuit court to quash the execution. This motion was overruled by the circuit court, and they appeal. . To this motion and the subsequent proceedings thereon the county of Jackson was not a party, and is not a party to this appeal. The title to real estate is not involved in the questions to be determined thereon (State ex rel. v. Court of Appeals, 67 Mo. 200; Dunn v. Miller, 96 Mo. 324), and the amount in dispute is below the jurisdiction of this court. The case is properly within the appellate jurisdiction of the Kansas City court of appeals, to which it is ordered that it be transferred.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shipley v. Pershing
5 S.W.2d 799 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1928)
King v. Hayes
4 S.W.2d 1062 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1928)
City of Kirkwood ex rel. McMahon v. Handlan
168 S.W. 346 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1914)
Stark v. Martin
102 S.W. 1089 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1907)
Shewalter v. City of Lexington
143 F. 161 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri, 1906)
State ex rel. Reed v. Elliott
79 S.W. 696 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1904)
Balz v. Nelson
72 S.W. 527 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1903)
Klingelhoefer v. Smith
71 S.W. 1008 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1903)
F. M. Bruner Granitoid Co. v. Klein
70 S.W. 687 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1902)
Price v. Blankenship
45 S.W. 1123 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1898)
State v. Zinn
42 S.W. 938 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1897)
Fischer v. Johnson
41 S.W. 203 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1897)
Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. Hezel
39 S.W. 781 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1897)
Lemmon v. Lincoln
32 S.W. 662 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1895)
Bobb v. Wolff
105 Mo. 52 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1891)
Bailey v. Winn
101 Mo. 649 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1890)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 Mo. 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corrigan-v-morris-mo-1888.