Corrigan v. Harris

Appellate Court of Illinois

Corrigan v. Harris

207 Ill. App. 291

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided October 2, 1917·No. Gen. No. 23,008·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Set-off and recoupment, § 40*- — when evidence sufficient to show loan made basis of set-off. In an action by an indorsee on a note, in which a set-off for money loaned to the payee was interposed, evidence held sufficient to show such loan. 3. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 29* — when judgment of not disturbed. A judgment of the Municipal Court will not be disturbed on appeal unless contrary to the greater weight of evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Set-off and recoupment, § 40*- — when evidence sufficient to show loan made basis of set-off. In an action by an indorsee on a note, in which a set-off for money loaned to the payee was interposed, evidence held sufficient to show such loan. 3. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 29* — when judgment of not disturbed. A judgment of the Municipal Court will not be disturbed on appeal unless contrary to the greater weight of evidence.

Corrigan v. Harris, 207 Ill. App. 291 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

207 Ill. App. 291 (Corrigan v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related