Corrigan v. Commissioner

103 F.2d 1010, 22 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1170, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 3727, 22 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 1170
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided April 1, 1939·No. No. 6915·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a petition to review a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals. The tax involved arises out of the same transactions which were before the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Baker v. Commissioner, 80 F.2d 813, and again in Cable v. Commissioner, 102 F.2d 977, and the questions involved are identical. That court in a careful and well reasoned opinion in the Baker case decided these questions in favor of the Government. We fully agree with its conclusions. Accordingly, upon the authority of its opinion, the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Corrigan v. Commissioner, 103 F.2d 1010, 22 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1170, 1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 3727, 22 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 1170 (3d Cir. 1939).

103 F.2d 1010 (Corrigan v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commissioner v. Phipps
167 F.2d 117 (Tenth Circuit, 1948)
Munter v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
157 F.2d 132 (Third Circuit, 1946)
Bazley v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
155 F.2d 237 (Third Circuit, 1946)
Putnam v. United States
149 F.2d 721 (First Circuit, 1945)
Campbell v. United States
144 F.2d 177 (Third Circuit, 1944)
Georday Enterprises v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.
126 F.2d 384 (Fourth Circuit, 1942)