Corrigan v. Atkins

Fourth Circuit

Corrigan v. Atkins

546 F. App'x 297

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 22, 2013·No. No. 13-7183·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mark R. Corrigan appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(3) motion for reconsideration of the court’s 2002 order granting Appellees’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing Corrigan’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Corrigan v. Atkins, No. 5:98-ct-00667-BR (E.D.N.C. July 9, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mark R. Corrigan appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(3) motion for reconsideration of the court’s 2002 order granting Appellees’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing Corrigan’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Corrigan v. Atkins, No. 5:98-ct-00667-BR (E.D.N.C. July 9, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Corrigan v. Atkins, 546 F. App'x 297 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

546 F. App'x 297 (Corrigan v. Atkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related