Corrie D. Norman v. State
This text of Corrie D. Norman v. State (Corrie D. Norman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ October 06, 2015
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A16I0024. CORRIE D. NORMAN v. THE STATE.
Corrie D. Norman, who is charged with multiple offenses including playing music too loud from a car, OCGA § 40-6-14 (a), seeks interlocutory review of the trial court’s order denying his amended motion to suppress. Before the trial court, Norman argued that Elbert County’s enforcement and application of OCGA § 40-6- 14 (a) was racially motivated and violated his constitutional equal protection rights.1 The trial court rejected Norman’s argument but certified its ruling for immediate review. Norman then filed this application for interlocutory appeal. The Supreme Court “has exclusive jurisdiction over all cases involving construction of the Constitution of the State of Georgia and of the United States and all cases in which the constitutionality of a law, ordinance, or constitutional provision has been called into question.” Atlanta Independent School System v. Lane, 266 Ga. 657 (1) (469 SE2d 22) (1996); Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Para. II. Because Norman’s motion called into question the constitutionality of OCGA § 40-6-14 (a), and the trial court specifically rejected his constitutionality argument, it appears that jurisdiction may lie in the Supreme Court. As the Supreme Court has the ultimate responsibility for determining appellate jurisdiction, see Saxton v. Coastal Dialysis & Med. Clinic, 267 Ga. 177, 178 (476 SE2d 587) (1996), this application is hereby
1 Norman asserts that he also argued, in his first motion to suppress, that the statute was overbroad and violated his rights to freedom of speech. He has not, however, included a copy of that motion or the trial court’s ruling with his application materials. TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 10/06/2015 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Corrie D. Norman v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corrie-d-norman-v-state-gactapp-2015.