Correos Vs. Ocwen Loan Serv. Llc

• Court: Nevada Supreme Court
• Decided: July 29, 2019
• Docket: 76932
• Status: Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

HAROLD CORREOS, No. 76932 Appellant, vs. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING; PRISCILLA BAKER; MCCARTHY & HOLTHUS LLP; AND WESTERN FILED PROGRESSIVE NEVADA INC., Res • ondents. JUL 2 9 2019 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY DEP CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from an order dismissing appellant's complaint. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Rob Bare, Judge. This appeal was docketed in this court on September 13, 2018. On June 14, 2019, this court entered an order directing appellant to file and serve, within 14 days, (1) a brief that complies with the requirements in NRAP 28(a) and NRAP 32 or (2) the "Informal Brief Form for Pro Se Parties" provided by the supreme court clerk, or a motion or stipulation to dismiss this appeal. Pursuant to the order, the documents were due on or before June 28, 2019. This court further cautioned that failure to file the opening brief could result in the dismissal of this appeal.1 To date appellant has failed to file the brief or otherwise communicate with this court.

1A copy of this order is attached. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) I947A Accordingly, it appears that appellant has abandoned this appeal, and this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Adau Pickering

A:24")14148.4461.7 J. Parraguirre Cadish

cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge Harold Correos McCarthy & Holthus, LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

HAROLD CORREOS, No. 76932 Appellant, vs. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING; PRISCILLA BAKER; MCCARTHY & FILED HOLTHUS LLP; AND WESTERN PROGRESSIVE NEVADA INC., JUN t 4 2019 Respondents. ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT

ORDER DEPUTY CLERX

Appellant filed a notice indicating that the parties h.ad agreed to arbitrate this appeal. Respondents dispute the assertion. This appeal shall proceed. Appellant shall have 14 days from the date of this order to file and serve either (1) a brief that complies with the requirements in NRAP 28(a) and NRAP 32 or • (2) the "Informal Brief Form for Pro Se Parties" provided by the supreme court clerk, or a motion or stipulation to dismiss this appeal. Respondents need not file a response to any brief filed by appellant unless directed to do so by this court. NRAP 46A(c). Failure to timely file an opening brief may result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal of this appeal. NRAP 31(d)(1). It is so ORDERED.

C.J.

cc: Harold Correos McCarthy & Holthus, LLP/Las Vegas

14 ssi