Corrente v. McNab

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Corrente v. McNab

96 A.D.2d 915, 465 N.Y.S.2d 847, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19533

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 24, 1983

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 96 A.D.2d 915 (Corrente v. McNab) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Corrente v. McNab, 96 A.D.2d 915, 465 N.Y.S.2d 847, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19533 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding to invalidate the petition designating Mae Gowdie and Kenneth A. Deegan as candidates in the Republican Party primary election to be held on September 13,1983, for the office of Member of the Republican County Committee, 63rd Election District, Town of Huntington, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mallon, J.), dated August 18, 1983, which, after a hearing, granted the application. Judgment modified, on the facts, by deleting the provision granting the application as to Kenneth A. Deegan and substituting therefor a provision denying the application as to him. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The board of elections is directed to restore the name of appellant Kenneth A. Deegan to the appropriate ballot. The record does not establish that the designee Kenneth A. Deegan participated in the irregularities or had any knowledge of them (see Matter of Cullen v Power, 21 AD2d 698, affd 14 NY2d 760). Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Brown and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding to invalidate the petition designating Mae Gowdie and Kenneth A. Deegan as candidates in the Republican Party primary election to be held on September 13,1983, for the office of Member of the Republican County Committee, 63rd Election District, Town of Huntington, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mallon, J.), dated August 18, 1983, which, after a hearing, granted the application. Judgment modified, on the facts, by deleting the provision granting the application as to Kenneth A. Deegan and substituting therefor a provision denying the application as to him. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The board of elections is directed to restore the name of appellant Kenneth A. Deegan to the appropriate ballot. The record does not establish that the designee Kenneth A. Deegan participated in the irregularities or had any knowledge of them (see Matter of Cullen v Power, 21 AD2d 698, affd 14 NY2d 760). Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Brown and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 A.D.2d 915, 465 N.Y.S.2d 847, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corrente-v-mcnab-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack