Correll v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Correll v. State

564 S.W.3d 401

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 26, 2018·No. No. ED 106441·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Janeane Correll appeals the denial without an evidentiary hearing of her Rule 24.035¹ motion for post-conviction relief. Correll claims that the motion court clearly erred because her conviction of the felony of stealing and sentence of six years' imprisonment were unlawful under the Missouri Supreme Court's decision in State v. Bazell , 497 S.W.3d 263 (Mo.banc 2016). We affirm.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Janeane Correll appeals the denial without an evidentiary hearing of her Rule 24.035¹ motion for post-conviction relief. Correll claims that the motion court clearly erred because her conviction of the felony of stealing and sentence of six years' imprisonment were unlawful under the Missouri Supreme Court's decision in State v. Bazell , 497 S.W.3d 263 (Mo.banc 2016). We affirm.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Correll v. State, 564 S.W.3d 401 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

564 S.W.3d 401 (Correll v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related