Correll v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Correll v. State

564 S.W.3d 401

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 26, 2018

DocketNo. ED 106441

StatusPublished

This text of 564 S.W.3d 401 (Correll v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Correll v. State, 564 S.W.3d 401 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Janeane Correll appeals the denial without an evidentiary hearing of her Rule 24.035¹ motion for post-conviction relief. Correll claims that the motion court clearly erred because her conviction of the felony of stealing and sentence of six years' imprisonment were unlawful under the Missouri Supreme Court's decision in State v. Bazell , 497 S.W.3d 263 (Mo.banc 2016). We affirm.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Janeane Correll appeals the denial without an evidentiary hearing of her Rule 24.035¹ motion for post-conviction relief. Correll claims that the motion court clearly erred because her conviction of the felony of stealing and sentence of six years' imprisonment were unlawful under the Missouri Supreme Court's decision in State v. Bazell , 497 S.W.3d 263 (Mo.banc 2016). We affirm.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

564 S.W.3d 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/correll-v-state-moctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack