Corrections Corp. of Am. v. Youngstown Human Relations Comm.

739 N.E.2d 813, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1487, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 3103
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 14, 2000
Docket00-1985
StatusPublished

This text of 739 N.E.2d 813 (Corrections Corp. of Am. v. Youngstown Human Relations Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Corrections Corp. of Am. v. Youngstown Human Relations Comm., 739 N.E.2d 813, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1487, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 3103 (Ohio 2000).

Opinion

Mahoning App. No. 99CA181. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. On December 6, 2000, appellee filed a memorandum in response that listed the name of Frederick L. Douglas as co-counsel. Frederick L. Douglas is not admitted to practice in Ohio and has not sought admission pro hoc vice as required by S.Ct.Prac.R. 1(1) and (2). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the name of Frederick L. Douglas be, and hereby is, stricken from the memorandum in response and that Frederick L. Douglas shall not be permitted to participate further in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
739 N.E.2d 813, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1487, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 3103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corrections-corp-of-am-v-youngstown-human-relations-comm-ohio-2000.