Correa v. Roadway Express
This text of Correa v. Roadway Express (Correa v. Roadway Express) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1163
JUVENTINO CORREA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ROADWAY EXPRESS,
Defendant - Appellee, and
HEALTH SOUTH,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-00-587-1)
Submitted: May 29, 2003 Decided: June 3, 2003
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Juventino Correa, Appellant Pro Se. Alan Bruce Clarke, Charles Matthew Keen, Sheri Lea Roberson, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Juventino Correa appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment in favor of Roadway Express in Correa’s employment
discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Correa v. Roadway Express, No. CA-00-587-1
(M.D.N.C. Jan. 2, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Correa v. Roadway Express, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/correa-v-roadway-express-ca4-2003.