Corralez v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
This text of 204 F. App'x 591 (Corralez v. Farmers Insurance Exchange) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
On January 12, 2005, the district court issued an injunction to protect its judgment in a companion case to this appeal, Miller, et al. v. Farmers Ins. Exchange, 466 F.3d 853 (9th Cir.2006). Now that we have reversed that judgment with respect to claims under Minnesota’s Fair Labor Standards Act, the district court’s denial of the Milner Class’s motion to vacate the injunction is reversed. We remand with instructions to the district court to vacate its injunction.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
204 F. App'x 591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corralez-v-farmers-insurance-exchange-ca9-2006.