Corralez v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
204 F. App'x 591
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
On January 12, 2005, the district court issued an injunction to protect its judgment in a companion case to this appeal, Miller, et al. v. Farmers Ins. Exchange, 466 F.3d 853 (9th Cir.2006). Now that we have reversed that judgment with respect to claims under Minnesota’s Fair Labor Standards Act, the district court’s denial of the Milner Class’s motion to vacate the injunction is reversed. We remand with instructions to the district court to vacate its injunction.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Corralez v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 204 F. App'x 591 (9th Cir. 2006).
204 F. App'x 591 (Corralez v. Farmers Insurance Exchange) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miller v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
466 F.3d 853 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)