Corrales v. State

768 So. 2d 1231, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12706, 2000 WL 1471625
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 4, 2000·No. No. 3D00-1648·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620, 627 (Fla.2000)(“if a person’s sentence imposed under the 1995 guidelines could have been imposed under the 1994 guidelines (without a departure), then that person shall not be entitled to relief under the decision here”); James v. State, 763 So.2d 535 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)(same).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Corrales v. State, 768 So. 2d 1231, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12706, 2000 WL 1471625 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

768 So. 2d 1231 (Corrales v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

James v. State
763 So. 2d 535 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Heggs v. State
759 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)