Corrado v. Providence Redevelopment Agency
111 R.I. 915
This text of 111 R.I. 915 (Corrado v. Providence Redevelopment Agency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Corrado v. Providence Redevelopment Agency, 111 R.I. 915 (R.I. 1973).
Opinion
Appellants’ pro se motion to remand to Superior Court for purpose of supplementing record denied without prejudice to right of appellants to renew motion at hearing on the merits. Appellants’ motion for extension of time granted and time is extended to April 2, 1973 in which to file brief.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
111 R.I. 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corrado-v-providence-redevelopment-agency-ri-1973.