Corrado v. City of Providence
112 R.I. 928
This text of 112 R.I. 928 (Corrado v. City of Providence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Corrado v. City of Providence, 112 R.I. 928 (R.I. 1973).
Opinion
Motion of defendants to dismiss appeal denied. Motion of plaintiffs-appellants for leave to file transcript out of time granted, and plaintiffs allowed 30 days from date of order in which to file transcript.
Samuel Corrado, pro se, for plaintiffs-appellants. Louis A. Mascia, City Solicitor, Ronald H. Glantz, Deputy City Solicitor, Timothy J. McCarthy, for defendants-appellees.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
112 R.I. 928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corrado-v-city-of-providence-ri-1973.