Corr v. Ottaway Newspapers Radio Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Corr v. Ottaway Newspapers Radio Inc.

40 A.D.2d 674, 336 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3825

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 2, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 40 A.D.2d 674 (Corr v. Ottaway Newspapers Radio Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Corr v. Ottaway Newspapers Radio Inc., 40 A.D.2d 674, 336 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3825 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for libel, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated March 29, 1972, which directed a judgment of said court, entered February 18, .1972, to be amended so as to reduce the taxed costs and disbursements granted to defendants against plaintiff from $432.50 to $150. Order modified, on the law and the facts, by increasing the amount of $150 in the decretal paragraph thereof to $417.50 and adding thereto the following: “consisting of $150 costs and $267.50 disbursements ”. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. CPLR 8301 (subd. [a]) permits a party to whom costs are awarded in an action to tax his necessary disbursements, to the extent specified and enumerated in that statute. Among the items permitted thereby to be taxed are the reasonable expense of taking and making two transcripts of testimony on an examination before trial, not exceeding $250 in any one action (par. [9]), the Sheriff’s fee ($2.50 [CPLR 8011, subd. [b], par. 1) for receiving an execution (CPLR 8301, subd. [a], par. 8) and the legal fees of officers for serving subpoenas on witnesses (see CPLR 8301, subd. [a], pars. 1, 12). Defendants established that they spent in excess of $250 in stenographers’ fees and spent $2.50 for a Sheriff’s fee, $3 for an index number, $3 for entering and docketing the judgment and $24 for serving subpoenas. The $3 fee claimed for an index number was not disputed by plaintiff and, where such fee has been allowed (CPLR 8301, subd. [a], par. 12), the fee for entering and docketing a judgment is not allowable (see CPLR 8018, subd. [d], par. 1). Of the $24 spent for serving subpoenas, $12 was spent for the service of subpoenas on three witnesses at a cost of $4 each (CPLR 8011, subd. [e], par. 1). The remaining $12 taxed for the service of subpoenas is not adequately explained in the record and hence no reimbursement of said amount may be allowed. Munder, Acting P. J., Latham, Gulotta, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for libel, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated March 29, 1972, which directed a judgment of said court, entered February 18, .1972, to be amended so as to reduce the taxed costs and disbursements granted to defendants against plaintiff from $432.50 to $150. Order modified, on the law and the facts, by increasing the amount of $150 in the decretal paragraph thereof to $417.50 and adding thereto the following: “consisting of $150 costs and $267.50 disbursements ”. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. CPLR 8301 (subd. [a]) permits a party to whom costs are awarded in an action to tax his necessary disbursements, to the extent specified and enumerated in that statute. Among the items permitted thereby to be taxed are the reasonable expense of taking and making two transcripts of testimony on an examination before trial, not exceeding $250 in any one action (par. [9]), the Sheriff’s fee ($2.50 [CPLR 8011, subd. [b], par. 1) for receiving an execution (CPLR 8301, subd. [a], par. 8) and the legal fees of officers for serving subpoenas on witnesses (see CPLR 8301, subd. [a], pars. 1, 12). Defendants established that they spent in excess of $250 in stenographers’ fees and spent $2.50 for a Sheriff’s fee, $3 for an index number, $3 for entering and docketing the judgment and $24 for serving subpoenas. The $3 fee claimed for an index number was not disputed by plaintiff and, where such fee has been allowed (CPLR 8301, subd. [a], par. 12), the fee for entering and docketing a judgment is not allowable (see CPLR 8018, subd. [d], par. 1). Of the $24 spent for serving subpoenas, $12 was spent for the service of subpoenas on three witnesses at a cost of $4 each (CPLR 8011, subd. [e], par. 1). The remaining $12 taxed for the service of subpoenas is not adequately explained in the record and hence no reimbursement of said amount may be allowed. Munder, Acting P. J., Latham, Gulotta, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A.D.2d 674, 336 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corr-v-ottaway-newspapers-radio-inc-nyappdiv-1972.