Corpus v. State

962 S.W.2d 590, 1998 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 17, 1998 WL 52127
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 11, 1998·No. No. 1622-96·Published

Opinions

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Appellant pleaded not guilty to driving while intoxicated. Tex.Rev.Civ. State. Ann. art. 67011-1 (Vernon Supp.1994) (current version at Tex. Penal Code Ann. 49.04 (Vernon 1 1994 & Supp.1998)). The trial court found him guilty and sentenced him to 180 days in jail and a $1,500 fine, probated for eighteen months. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Corpus v. State, 931 S.W.2d 30 (Tex.App.—Austin 1996).

We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine (1) the applicability of the Medical Practices Act, Article 4495b, § 5.08, revised civil statutes, to appellant’s case, and (2) whether appellant’s medical records were obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, Article I, § 9 of the Texas Constitution, and Article 38.23 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. After careful review of the appellate record, the Court of Appeals’ opinion, and the briefs before this Court, we conclude that our initial decision to grant review was improvident. Accordingly, we dismiss appellant’s petition for discretionary review. Tex. R.App. P. 69.3.

OVERSTREET and MEYERS, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Corpus v. State, 962 S.W.2d 590, 1998 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 17, 1998 WL 52127 (Tex. 1998).

962 S.W.2d 590 (Corpus v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Houston v. State
846 S.W.2d 848 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1993)
Corpus v. State
931 S.W.2d 30 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)
Texas Utilities Electric Co. v. City of Waco
919 S.W.2d 436 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)