Corpus v. State
This text of 962 S.W.2d 590 (Corpus v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Appellant pleaded not guilty to driving while intoxicated. Tex.Rev.Civ. State. Ann. art. 67011-1 (Vernon Supp.1994) (current version at Tex. Penal Code Ann. 49.04 (Vernon 1 1994 & Supp.1998)). The trial court found him guilty and sentenced him to 180 days in jail and a $1,500 fine, probated for eighteen months. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Corpus v. State, 931 S.W.2d 30 (Tex.App.—Austin 1996).
We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine (1) the applicability of the Medical Practices Act, Article 4495b, § 5.08, revised civil statutes, to appellant’s case, and (2) whether appellant’s medical records were obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, Article I, § 9 of the Texas Constitution, and Article 38.23 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. After careful review of the appellate record, the Court of Appeals’ opinion, and the briefs before this Court, we conclude that our initial decision to grant review was improvident. Accordingly, we dismiss appellant’s petition for discretionary review. Tex. R.App. P. 69.3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
962 S.W.2d 590, 1998 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 17, 1998 WL 52127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corpus-v-state-texcrimapp-1998.