Corporation of San Patricio v. Mathis

58 Tex. 242, 1883 Tex. LEXIS 5
Texas Supreme Court·Decided January 9, 1883·No. Case No. 1488·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Willie, Chief Justice.

The only question for our determination in this case is, where the location of a disputed line between adjacent surveys has been determined in an action of trespass to try title, and there is no question as to the title to either survey, is the defeated plaintiff entitled to his second suit in order to have another adjudication of the same question ? This precise point was decided in the case of Spence v. McGowan, 53 Tex., 30, where it was held that such second suit could not be maintained.

Our Revised Statutes provide that such suits may be brought only in cases where the first action was begun before their adoption, viz., September 1,1879. The question must therefore soon cease to be of any practical importance. For this reason we the more readily yield our assent to a final settlement of the point in accordance with the opinion of our predecessors in the above cited cause. Regarding that decision as authoritative, the court below could not have done otherwise than sustain a general demurrer to the petition and dismiss the cause, and its judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Associate Justice Stayton did not sit in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Corporation of San Patricio v. Mathis, 58 Tex. 242, 1883 Tex. LEXIS 5 (Tex. 1883).

58 Tex. 242 (Corporation of San Patricio v. Mathis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Permian Oil Co. v. Smith
73 S.W.2d 490 (Texas Supreme Court, 1937)
Carley v. Parton
12 S.W. 950 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1889)
Jones v. Andrews
9 S.W. 170 (Texas Supreme Court, 1888)
Barbee v. Stinnett
60 Tex. 167 (Texas Supreme Court, 1883)