Corporation Commission v. . Latham

160 S.E. 295, 201 N.C. 342, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 235
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 23, 1931·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

It was held in Trust Co. v. Jenkins, 193 N. C., 761, 138 S. E., 139, “that no person who appears upon the records of a bank as a stockholder therein is relieved of personal liability under 3 C. S., 219(a), by virtue of the provisions of 3 C. S., 219(c), unless the said record, or the stock certificate issued to him, shows that he holds the said stock as trustee for a cestui que trust named on the record or in the certificate.”

Under this holding and on the facts appearing of record, it would seem that the present defendant ought not to be held individually responsible as a stockholder in the Bank of Belhaven under 3 0. S., 219(a), for the amount assessable against the stock duly transferred by him 16 May, 1925, in good faith, to J. R. Latham, trustee, and H. Y. Latham, trustee.

The decision in Early, Receiver, v. Richardson, 280 U. S., 496, cited and relied upon by plaintiffs, is distinguishable by reason of a different fact situation.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Corporation Commission v. . Latham, 160 S.E. 295, 201 N.C. 342, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 235 (N.C. 1931).

160 S.E. 295 (Corporation Commission v. . Latham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Goldsboro Savings & Trust Co.
165 S.E. 705 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)