Corporate Recoveries Inc v. Hill

• Court: District Court, W.D. Washington
• Decided: December 23, 2024
• Docket: 2:24-cv-01746
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 The Honorable Barbara J. Rothstein

5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 AT SEATTLE

7 NO. 24-cv-1746-BJR CORPORATE RECOVERIES, INC., 8 ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR Plaintiff, FAILURE TO PROSECUTE 9 v. 10 DAVID HILL, et al., 11 Defendants. 12

13 This case came before the Court on removal from King County Superior Court on October 14 25, 2024. On November 20, 2024, the Court permitted Plaintiff’s counsel to withdraw under RPC 15 1.16. Order, ECF No. 21. In that Order, the Court advised Plaintiff that as a corporate entity, it is 16 required by law to be represented by an attorney admitted to practice before this Court. Id. Plaintiff 17 had previously been advised by counsel as required under Local Rule 83.2. Id. The Court 18 forewarned Plaintiff that failure to obtain a replacement attorney by December 2, 2024 may result 19 in dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims without further notice for failure to prosecute. Id. 20 On December 2, 2024, Plaintiff filed a status report requesting a two-week extension on the 21 deadline for obtaining new representation. ECF No. 23. The Court granted Plaintiff’s request, 22 giving it until December 16, 2024, to retain new counsel. That deadline has passed, but no counsel 23

24 ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE 1 has filed an appearance for Plaintiff, nor has Plaintiff provided any status or request for further 2 extension. 3 Plaintiff may not proceed pro se as it is a corporation. See, e.g., Rowland v. Cal. Men’s 4 Colony, Unit II Men’s Advisory Council, 506 U.S. 194, 201–02 (1993) (“It has been the law for the 5 better part of two centuries . . . that a corporation may appear in the federal courts only through 6 licensed counsel.”); In re America West Airlines, 40 F.3d 1058, 1059 (9th Cir. 1994) (“Corporations 7 and other unincorporated associations must appear in court through an attorney.”); also see Local 8 Rule 83.2(b)(4) (“A business entity, except a sole proprietorship, must be represented by counsel.”). 9 Accordingly, the Court hereby dismisses this action for want of prosecution. Dismissal shall 10 be without prejudice and shall not be considered an adjudication on the merits. The Clerk is directed 11 to close this case.

12 DATED this 23rd day of December 2024. 13 A 14 B arbara Jacobs Rothstein 15 U.S. District Court Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

24 ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE