Corporate Property Investors v. Uniondale Union Free School District No. 2

551 N.E.2d 595, 75 N.Y.2d 802, 552 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 122
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 18, 1990·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the grounds that (1) so much of the order sought to be appealed from as addresses petitioners’ claims against the county does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution and it is not a nonfinal order of the type within the meaning of CPLR 5602 (a) (2), and (2) movants are not aggrieved by so much of the order sought to be appealed from as affirmed Supreme Court’s dismissal of the petition against the school district (CPLR 5511). Motion for consolidation dismissed as academic. Cross motion for leave to appeal denied. Cross motions for consolidation and for notice to the Attorney-General dismissed as academic.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Corporate Property Investors v. Uniondale Union Free School District No. 2, 551 N.E.2d 595, 75 N.Y.2d 802, 552 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 122 (N.Y. 1990).

551 N.E.2d 595 (Corporate Property Investors v. Uniondale Union Free School District No. 2) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. v. Town of Chatham Board of Assessors
239 A.D.2d 831 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Video Aid Corp. v. Town of Wallkill
651 N.E.2d 886 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)