Corporate Interiors, Inc. v. Pappas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Corporate Interiors, Inc. v. Pappas

293 A.D.2d 640, 740 N.Y.S.2d 648, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3954

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 22, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 293 A.D.2d 640 (Corporate Interiors, Inc. v. Pappas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Corporate Interiors, Inc. v. Pappas, 293 A.D.2d 640, 740 N.Y.S.2d 648, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3954 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for, inter alia, breach of fiduciary duty, the defendants appeal from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), entered June 25, 2001, which, among other things, granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for a protective order with regard to the defendants’ subpoena to compel production of the plaintiffs tax documents.

[641]*641Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendants failed to demonstrate the necessity of disclosure of the plaintiffs tax documents, as the information sought was available from other sources (see Abbene v Griffin, 208 AD2d 483; Consentino v Schwartz, 155 AD2d 640, 641). Santucci, J.P., Altman, Townes and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for, inter alia, breach of fiduciary duty, the defendants appeal from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), entered June 25, 2001, which, among other things, granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for a protective order with regard to the defendants’ subpoena to compel production of the plaintiffs tax documents.

[641]*641Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendants failed to demonstrate the necessity of disclosure of the plaintiffs tax documents, as the information sought was available from other sources (see Abbene v Griffin, 208 AD2d 483; Consentino v Schwartz, 155 AD2d 640, 641). Santucci, J.P., Altman, Townes and Crane, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

293 A.D.2d 640, 740 N.Y.S.2d 648, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corporate-interiors-inc-v-pappas-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack