Coronel v. THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK
862 N.E.2d 782, 8 N.Y.3d 838, 830 N.Y.S.2d 691
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question not answered as unnecessary. We agree with the Appellate Division that plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact sufficient to defeat defendant bank’s summary judgment motion.
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith and Pigott.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Coronel v. THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, 862 N.E.2d 782, 8 N.Y.3d 838, 830 N.Y.S.2d 691 (N.Y. 2007).
862 N.E.2d 782 (Coronel v. THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Larkins (William)
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019
Kumar v. Farber
115 A.D.3d 567 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)