Coronel v. THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK

New York Court of Appeals

Coronel v. THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK

862 N.E.2d 782, 8 N.Y.3d 838, 830 N.Y.S.2d 691

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 16, 2007

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 862 N.E.2d 782 (Coronel v. THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coronel v. THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, 862 N.E.2d 782, 8 N.Y.3d 838, 830 N.Y.S.2d 691 (N.Y. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question not answered as unnecessary. We agree with the Appellate Division that plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact sufficient to defeat defendant bank’s summary judgment motion.

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith and Pigott.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question not answered as unnecessary. We agree with the Appellate Division that plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact sufficient to defeat defendant bank’s summary judgment motion.

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith and Pigott.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

862 N.E.2d 782, 8 N.Y.3d 838, 830 N.Y.S.2d 691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coronel-v-the-chase-manhattan-bank-ny-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack