Corona v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Corona v. City of New York

100 A.D.3d 541, 954 N.Y.S.2d 92

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 20, 2012

StatusPublished

This text of 100 A.D.3d 541 (Corona v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Corona v. City of New York, 100 A.D.3d 541, 954 N.Y.S.2d 92 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Larry S. Schachner, J), entered March 12, 2012, which granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Dismissal of the complaint was warranted in this action where plaintiff was injured while participating in a recreational softball game. As plaintiff was running, he stepped in a rut in the field and injured his leg. It is well established that “by engaging in a sport or recreational activity, a participant consents to those commonly appreciated risks which are inherent in and arise out of the nature of the sport generally and flow from such participation” (Morgan v State of New York, 90 NY2d 471, 484 [1997]). Here, plaintiff assumed the risk of injury by voluntarily participating in the sport of softball and the risks inherent in the sport include those associated with the construction of the playing surface (see Lincoln v Canastota Cent. School Dist., 53 AD3d 851, 852 [3d Dept 2008]). The game was played on a natural surface and plaintiff had the experience to know that imperfections might be present, and indeed, may have been created or increased over the course of the game (compare Furnari v City of New York, 89 AD3d 605, 606-607 [1st Dept 2011]).

[542]*542We have considered plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Sweeny, Moskowitz, Renwick and Freedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Larry S. Schachner, J), entered March 12, 2012, which granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Dismissal of the complaint was warranted in this action where plaintiff was injured while participating in a recreational softball game. As plaintiff was running, he stepped in a rut in the field and injured his leg. It is well established that “by engaging in a sport or recreational activity, a participant consents to those commonly appreciated risks which are inherent in and arise out of the nature of the sport generally and flow from such participation” (Morgan v State of New York, 90 NY2d 471, 484 [1997]). Here, plaintiff assumed the risk of injury by voluntarily participating in the sport of softball and the risks inherent in the sport include those associated with the construction of the playing surface (see Lincoln v Canastota Cent. School Dist., 53 AD3d 851, 852 [3d Dept 2008]). The game was played on a natural surface and plaintiff had the experience to know that imperfections might be present, and indeed, may have been created or increased over the course of the game (compare Furnari v City of New York, 89 AD3d 605, 606-607 [1st Dept 2011]).

[542]*542We have considered plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Sweeny, Moskowitz, Renwick and Freedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 A.D.3d 541, 954 N.Y.S.2d 92, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corona-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack