Corona Gutierrez v. Mukasey
This text of 305 F. App'x 311 (Corona Gutierrez v. Mukasey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Norberto Corona Gutierrez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that Corona Gutierrez failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005).
Reviewing de novo, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), we reject Corona Gutierrez’s contention that the agency erred or violated due process in its cumulative analysis of hardship factors. It is evident from the IJ’s decision that he weighed the factors both individually and cumulatively and that, considering all the relevant factors, concluded that Corona Gutierrez had not demonstrated the requisite hardship.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
305 F. App'x 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corona-gutierrez-v-mukasey-ca9-2008.