Corona Coal Co. v. King

88 So. 921, 205 Ala. 696
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Corona Coal Co. v. King. Read the opinion of the Court — 204 Ala. 223
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided December 2, 1920·No. 6 Div. 55.·Published

Opinion

BROWN, J.

We have carefully examined the record and assignments of error in this case, and find that the questions presented in the instant case are identical with those presented and dealt with in Corona Coal Co. v. Hooker, 85 South. 477; 1 Corona Coal Co. v. King, 85 South. 479, 2 and Corona Coal Co. v. Wright, 85 South. 480, 3 and, on the authority of those cases, ' the judgment of the circuit court will be affirmed. Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and GARDNER, JJ., concur.
1

204 Ala. 221.

2

204 Ala. 223.

3

204 Ala 224.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Corona Coal Co. v. King, 88 So. 921, 205 Ala. 696 (Ala. 1920).

88 So. 921 (Corona Coal Co. v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Corona Coal Co. v. Wright
85 So. 480 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1920)
Corona Coal Co. v. King
85 So. 479 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1920)
Corona Coal Co. v. Hooker
85 So. 477 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1920)