Corominas v. Alfaro

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico

Corominas v. Alfaro

19 P.R. 555

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico·Decided May 27, 1913·No. No. 102·Published

Opinion

DECISION.

In petitioning for a writ of certiorari to a municipal court, when the petitioners fail to comply with Eule 69 of this court requiring that they set forth the reasons why it is indispensable that the same should he considered originally by this court, the petition will be dismissed.

Petition dismissed.

Chief Justice Hernandez and Justices Wolf, del Toro and Aldrey concurred. Mr. Justice MacLeary did not take part in the decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DECISION.

In petitioning for a writ of certiorari to a municipal court, when the petitioners fail to comply with Eule 69 of this court requiring that they set forth the reasons why it is indispensable that the same should he considered originally by this court, the petition will be dismissed.

Petition dismissed.

Chief Justice Hernandez and Justices Wolf, del Toro and Aldrey concurred. Mr. Justice MacLeary did not take part in the decision of this case.

Corominas v. Alfaro, 19 P.R. 555 (prsupreme 1913).

Pincite

19 P.R. 555 (Corominas v. Alfaro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.