Corominas v. Alfaro

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico

Corominas v. Alfaro

19 P.R. 555

CourtSupreme Court of Puerto Rico

DecidedMay 27, 1913

DocketNo. 102

StatusPublished

This text of 19 P.R. 555 (Corominas v. Alfaro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Puerto Rico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Corominas v. Alfaro, 19 P.R. 555 (prsupreme 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

DECISION.

In petitioning for a writ of certiorari to a municipal court, when the petitioners fail to comply with Eule 69 of this court requiring that they set forth the reasons why it is indispensable that the same should he considered originally by this court, the petition will be dismissed.

Petition dismissed.

Chief Justice Hernandez and Justices Wolf, del Toro and Aldrey concurred. Mr. Justice MacLeary did not take part in the decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DECISION.

In petitioning for a writ of certiorari to a municipal court, when the petitioners fail to comply with Eule 69 of this court requiring that they set forth the reasons why it is indispensable that the same should he considered originally by this court, the petition will be dismissed.

Petition dismissed.

Chief Justice Hernandez and Justices Wolf, del Toro and Aldrey concurred. Mr. Justice MacLeary did not take part in the decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 P.R. 555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corominas-v-alfaro-prsupreme-1913.