Coro, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Coro, Inc. v. United States

34 Cust. Ct. 265

United States Customs Court·Decided January 13, 1955·No. No. 58702; protest 215510-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the issue herein is similar in all material respects to that involved in United States v. Washington State Liquor Control Board (34 C. C. P. A. 118, C. A. D. 352) and that the merchandise, consisting of 118)3 dozen necklets out of case HL 251, was not in fact imported. In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited, as well as that in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351), it was held that duty is not assessable upon the 118)3 dozen necklets missing from case HL 251. The protest was sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the issue herein is similar in all material respects to that involved in United States v. Washington State Liquor Control Board (34 C. C. P. A. 118, C. A. D. 352) and that the merchandise, consisting of 118)3 dozen necklets out of case HL 251, was not in fact imported. In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited, as well as that in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351), it was held that duty is not assessable upon the 118)3 dozen necklets missing from case HL 251. The protest was sustained to this extent.

Coro, Inc. v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 265 (cusc 1955).

Pincite

34 Cust. Ct. 265 (Coro, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.