Cornwell v. Moore

73 A.2d 352, 8 N.J. Super. 84
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided May 22, 1950·Published

Opinion

8 N.J. Super. 84 (1950)
73 A.2d 352

RUSSELL BIERCE CORNWELL, SUBSTITUTED ADMINISTRATOR, ETC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
GEORGE W. MOORE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND CLARK L. CORNWELL, JR., AND ANOTHER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued May 15, 1950.
Decided May 22, 1950.

*85 Before Judges JACOBS, DONGES and BIGELOW.

*87 Mr. A. Leo Bohl argued the cause for the appellant.

Mr. Charles S. Van Auken argued the cause for the respondents.

The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.

We have little to add to the opinion of Judge Grimshaw. Appellant counts on the rule that where there is no express gift of a legacy distinct from the direction for its payment, the legacy does not vest until the time for payment arrives. But Miss Bierce's will comes within an exception to the rule: Where the legacy is payable upon the termination of a prior life estate, and the legatee is a person living at testator's death, the legacy vests at testator's death. Redmond v. Gummere, 94 N.J. Eq. 216 (E. & A. 1922); Sadler v. Bergstrom, 113 N.J. Eq. 567 (Buchanan, V.C., 1933). Or, to use more general language, where the payment of the legacy in question is postponed only to let in some prior interest, the gift is vested. Howell v. Green, 31 N.J.L. 570 (E. & A. 1864).

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cornwell v. Moore, 73 A.2d 352, 8 N.J. Super. 84 (N.J. Ct. App. 1950).

73 A.2d 352 (Cornwell v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sadler v. Bergstrom
168 A. 50 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1933)
Howell v. Green
31 N.J.L. 570 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1864)
Redmond v. Gummere
119 A. 631 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1922)