Cornutt v. State

38 S.W.2d 91, 117 Tex. Crim. 160, 1931 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 323
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 4, 1931·No. No. 14122.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

*161 HAWKINS, Judge.

— Conviction is for selling intoxicating liquor, punishment being one year in the penitentiary.

No statement of facts is brought to this court.

The only tangible thing found in the record which would ordinarily form a basis for action by this court is appellant’s objections to the charge of the court. All of such objections turned upon a claim .that certain instructions were not justified by the evidence. Manifestly it is impossible for the court to appraise such objections in the absence of the statement of facts.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cornutt v. State, 38 S.W.2d 91, 117 Tex. Crim. 160, 1931 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 323 (Tex. 1931).

38 S.W.2d 91 (Cornutt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Rathmell
717 S.W.2d 33 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1986)
Homan v. Hughes
708 S.W.2d 449 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1986)