Cornutt v. State

38 S.W.2d 91, 117 Tex. Crim. 160, 1931 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 323
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 4, 1931
DocketNo. 14122.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 38 S.W.2d 91 (Cornutt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cornutt v. State, 38 S.W.2d 91, 117 Tex. Crim. 160, 1931 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 323 (Tex. 1931).

Opinions

*161 HAWKINS, Judge.

— Conviction is for selling intoxicating liquor, punishment being one year in the penitentiary.

No statement of facts is brought to this court.

The only tangible thing found in the record which would ordinarily form a basis for action by this court is appellant’s objections to the charge of the court. All of such objections turned upon a claim .that certain instructions were not justified by the evidence. Manifestly it is impossible for the court to appraise such objections in the absence of the statement of facts.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Rathmell
717 S.W.2d 33 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1986)
Homan v. Hughes
708 S.W.2d 449 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 S.W.2d 91, 117 Tex. Crim. 160, 1931 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cornutt-v-state-texcrimapp-1931.