Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Corns v. State

Corns v. State

787 So. 2d 240, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7154, 2001 WL 539622
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 23, 2001
DocketNo. 2D01-542
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 787 So. 2d 240 (Corns v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Corns v. State, 787 So. 2d 240, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7154, 2001 WL 539622 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Michael Corns filed a motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). In his motion, Corns alleged that he was entitled to additional jail credit. We affirm the trial court’s order denying relief without prejudice to any right Corns may have to file a facially sufficient motion to correct illegal sentence alleging that the error is reviewable from the face of the record. See State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1998).

Affirmed.

PATTERSON, C.J., and ALTENBERND and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dunbar v. State
787 So. 2d 240 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
787 So. 2d 240, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7154, 2001 WL 539622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corns-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.