Cornog v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Cornog v. State

33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 258, 1979 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 67

CourtCourt of Claims of Illinois

DecidedDecember 13, 1979

DocketNo. 78-CC-1676

StatusPublished

This text of 33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 258 (Cornog v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Claims of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cornog v. State, 33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 258, 1979 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 67 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record in this cause indicated that the purpose of the claim is for reimbursement for Claimant’s property which was lost while in the proper possession of the Respondent. The record also indicates that the Attorney General has entered into a stipulation based on the information forwarded to his office by the attorney for the Board of Regents of the Regency Universities as is evidenced by the letter marked Exhibit A attached to the stipulation. Furthermore, there is attached to the stipulation, marked Exhibit B, a bill of particulars submitted to the Respondent by the Claimant which lists the items lost and their reasonable value.

Accordingly, this Court finds that this is a proper claim, and the values given are reasonable, usual and customary for the items lost. No part of this claim has been paid and the total sum outstanding is $354.49.

It is hereby ordered that the Claimant be awarded, in full satisfaction of any and all claims presented to the State of Illinois under the above captioned cause, the sum of $354.49.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The record in this cause indicated that the purpose of the claim is for reimbursement for Claimant’s property which was lost while in the proper possession of the Respondent. The record also indicates that the Attorney General has entered into a stipulation based on the information forwarded to his office by the attorney for the Board of Regents of the Regency Universities as is evidenced by the letter marked Exhibit A attached to the stipulation. Furthermore, there is attached to the stipulation, marked Exhibit B, a bill of particulars submitted to the Respondent by the Claimant which lists the items lost and their reasonable value.

Accordingly, this Court finds that this is a proper claim, and the values given are reasonable, usual and customary for the items lost. No part of this claim has been paid and the total sum outstanding is $354.49.

It is hereby ordered that the Claimant be awarded, in full satisfaction of any and all claims presented to the State of Illinois under the above captioned cause, the sum of $354.49.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 258, 1979 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cornog-v-state-ilclaimsct-1979.