Cornish v. Kappos

Federal Circuit

Cornish v. Kappos

368 F. App'x 117

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedOctober 21, 2009

DocketNo. 2009-1093

StatusPublished

This text of 368 F. App'x 117 (Cornish v. Kappos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cornish v. Kappos, 368 F. App'x 117 (Fed. Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

A combined petition for panel rehearing and for rehearing en banc having been filed by the Appellant, and the petition for rehearing, having been referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc having been referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service,

UPON CONSIDERATION THEREOF, it is

ORDERED that the petition for panel rehearing be, and the same hereby is, DENIED and it is further

ORDERED that the petition for rehearing en banc be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.

[118]*118The mandate of the court will issue on October 28, 2009.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

A combined petition for panel rehearing and for rehearing en banc having been filed by the Appellant, and the petition for rehearing, having been referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc having been referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service,

UPON CONSIDERATION THEREOF, it is

ORDERED that the petition for panel rehearing be, and the same hereby is, DENIED and it is further

ORDERED that the petition for rehearing en banc be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.

[118]*118The mandate of the court will issue on October 28, 2009.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

368 F. App'x 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cornish-v-kappos-cafc-2009.