Corning v. Glenville Woollen Co.
This text of 14 Abb. Pr. 339 (Corning v. Glenville Woollen Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
If the plaintiff Isham obtained a valid prior lien upon any of the property which Corning seeks to reach by his proceedings supplementary to execution, such lien cannot be devested by these proceedings supplementary to execution, and I do not know of any practice which would justify this motion, or which will require Corning in his proceedings supplementary to execution to make Isham a party, or to serve him with notice of his proceedings.
This motion must be denied, with $10 costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 Abb. Pr. 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corning-v-glenville-woollen-co-nysupct-1862.