Corning v. Bridgewater Gas Co.

100 Ill. App. 221, 1902 Ill. App. LEXIS 695
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedFebruary 21, 1902
StatusPublished

This text of 100 Ill. App. 221 (Corning v. Bridgewater Gas Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Corning v. Bridgewater Gas Co., 100 Ill. App. 221, 1902 Ill. App. LEXIS 695 (Ill. Ct. App. 1902).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff in error insists that the collateral stock should, in accordance with his alleged agreement with Green, have been offered for sale and the proceeds applied on the note. The stock was canceled by agreement of plaintiff in error, and thereafter there was no collateral stock to be sold or offered for sale.

Moreover, the alleged agreement was not with the Bridge-water G-as Company, nor did it, so far as appears, have notice thereof; while presumably it took the note bona fide, for value, and before it became due.

The judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 Ill. App. 221, 1902 Ill. App. LEXIS 695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corning-v-bridgewater-gas-co-illappct-1902.