Corning v. Board of Elections
This text of 440 N.E.2d 1326 (Corning v. Board of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
In Matter of Corning v Board of Elections of Albany County: Order affirmed, without costs, for reasons stated in the Per Curiam opinion at the Appellate Division.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler and Meyer. Judge Fuchsberg dissents and votes to modify in an opinion. Judge Gabrielli taking no part.
In Barone v Carey: Judgment, insofar as appealed from, reversed, without costs, and subdivision 2 of section 8-100 of the Election Law declared constitutional.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler and Meyer. Judge Fuchsberg dissents and votes to affirm in an opinion. Judge Gabrielli taking no part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
440 N.E.2d 1326, 57 N.Y.2d 746, 454 N.Y.S.2d 979, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corning-v-board-of-elections-ny-1982.