Corning v. Babcock

95 N.Y.S. 1123

This text of 95 N.Y.S. 1123 (Corning v. Babcock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Corning v. Babcock, 95 N.Y.S. 1123 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied. Held, that as this motion is based solely upon the failure of the appellant to serve a case, and not upon the failure to comply with rule 41, the motion cannot be granted. The respondents should have applied to the Special Term for an order declaring the case and exceptions abandoned.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 N.Y.S. 1123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corning-v-babcock-nyappdiv-1905.