Corning Glass Works v. Southern New England Telephone Co.

Second Circuit

Corning Glass Works v. Southern New England Telephone Co.

835 F.2d 451, 1987 WL 21697

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedDecember 17, 1987

DocketNo. 298, Docket 87-7535

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 835 F.2d 451 (Corning Glass Works v. Southern New England Telephone Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Corning Glass Works v. Southern New England Telephone Co., 835 F.2d 451, 1987 WL 21697 (2d Cir. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York, Michael Telesca, Judge, entered pursuant to a decision and order which 1) granted the plaintiff’s request for a declaratory judgment that, pursuant to a 1975 Patent License Agreement between Western Electric Company, Inc. and Corning Glass Works, the Southern New England Telephone Company (“SNET”) does not possess a sublicense for patents held by Corning Glass Works relating to optical communications systems, optical fiber devices, optical fiber interconnecting apparatus, and optical modulators; 2) rejected SNET’s affirmative defenses of estoppel and acquiescence; and 3) denied SNET’s counterclaims for interference with business relationships and unfair competition. The order is affirmed substantially for the reasons given by Judge Telesca in his thorough opinion, reported at 674 F.Supp. 999 (W.D.N.Y.1987).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York, Michael Telesca, Judge, entered pursuant to a decision and order which 1) granted the plaintiff’s request for a declaratory judgment that, pursuant to a 1975 Patent License Agreement between Western Electric Company, Inc. and Corning Glass Works, the Southern New England Telephone Company (“SNET”) does not possess a sublicense for patents held by Corning Glass Works relating to optical communications systems, optical fiber devices, optical fiber interconnecting apparatus, and optical modulators; 2) rejected SNET’s affirmative defenses of estoppel and acquiescence; and 3) denied SNET’s counterclaims for interference with business relationships and unfair competition. The order is affirmed substantially for the reasons given by Judge Telesca in his thorough opinion, reported at 674 F.Supp. 999 (W.D.N.Y.1987).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

835 F.2d 451, 1987 WL 21697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corning-glass-works-v-southern-new-england-telephone-co-ca2-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack