Corning Glass Works v. Corning Cut Glass Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Corning Glass Works v. Corning Cut Glass Co.

78 N.Y.S. 1112

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 7, 1902

StatusPublished

This text of 78 N.Y.S. 1112 (Corning Glass Works v. Corning Cut Glass Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Corning Glass Works v. Corning Cut Glass Co., 78 N.Y.S. 1112 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Order appealed from reversed, and order of May 31, 1902, amended by inserting therein, at the end of the first restraining paragraph thereof, the following: “It is also ordered that said defendants, their servants, agents, and attorneys, and each of them, be, and they hereby are, enjoined from in any manner using the word ‘Coming,’ or the words ‘Corning Cut Glass,’ or any combination thereof, in connection with the sale, offering for sale, or advertising of its glass, unless such use shall in each instance be accompanied by a statement which shall clearly indicate to any purchaser, or prospective purchaser, and to the public, that the glass sold, offered for sale, or advertised by the defendant is not glass manufactured by the plaintiff, or from blanks manufactured by it,” — without costs of this appeal to either party.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Order appealed from reversed, and order of May 31, 1902, amended by inserting therein, at the end of the first restraining paragraph thereof, the following: “It is also ordered that said defendants, their servants, agents, and attorneys, and each of them, be, and they hereby are, enjoined from in any manner using the word ‘Coming,’ or the words ‘Corning Cut Glass,’ or any combination thereof, in connection with the sale, offering for sale, or advertising of its glass, unless such use shall in each instance be accompanied by a statement which shall clearly indicate to any purchaser, or prospective purchaser, and to the public, that the glass sold, offered for sale, or advertised by the defendant is not glass manufactured by the plaintiff, or from blanks manufactured by it,” — without costs of this appeal to either party.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 N.Y.S. 1112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corning-glass-works-v-corning-cut-glass-co-nyappdiv-1902.