Corning Glass Works v. Coe
141 F.2d 550, 79 U.S. App. D.C. 395, 61 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 544, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 3739
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedApril 10, 1944
DocketNo. 8531
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 141 F.2d 550 (Corning Glass Works v. Coe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Corning Glass Works v. Coe, 141 F.2d 550, 79 U.S. App. D.C. 395, 61 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 544, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 3739 (D.C. Cir. 1944).
Opinion
The findings and judgment of the trial court, 51 F.Supp. 232, find full support in the record. Appellant has failed to meet the burden imposed upon a plaintiff in a Section 4915 proceeding1 and is not entitled to a patent.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Besser v. Ooms
154 F.2d 17 (D.C. Circuit, 1946)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
141 F.2d 550, 79 U.S. App. D.C. 395, 61 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 544, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 3739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corning-glass-works-v-coe-cadc-1944.