Corning Firefighters, Local 932 v. City of Corning

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Corning Firefighters, Local 932 v. City of Corning

97 A.D.2d 975, 468 N.Y.S.2d 792, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20814

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 4, 1983·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Special Term properly remitted the award to the arbitration panel for correction of mathematical calculations and clarification of job classifications (see, e.g., Matter of Jolson [Forest Labs.], 15 AD2d 901; Matter of Canestrari v Uniform Firefighters, 15 PERB 7530; Caso v Coffey, 8 PERB 7514). Its order should, however, be modified to direct that, in addition to specifying the particular job classification into which each fire fighter falls, the panel set forth a detailed classification of all fire fighter positions existing at the time of the award and the new corresponding salaries for each position under the award. Such a clarification is necessary to effectuate intelligent judicial review of the award. (Appeals from order of Supreme Court, Steuben County, Purple, J. — art 78.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Denman, Boomer and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Special Term properly remitted the award to the arbitration panel for correction of mathematical calculations and clarification of job classifications (see, e.g., Matter of Jolson [Forest Labs.], 15 AD2d 901; Matter of Canestrari v Uniform Firefighters, 15 PERB 7530; Caso v Coffey, 8 PERB 7514). Its order should, however, be modified to direct that, in addition to specifying the particular job classification into which each fire fighter falls, the panel set forth a detailed classification of all fire fighter positions existing at the time of the award and the new corresponding salaries for each position under the award. Such a clarification is necessary to effectuate intelligent judicial review of the award. (Appeals from order of Supreme Court, Steuben County, Purple, J. — art 78.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Denman, Boomer and Moule, JJ.

Corning Firefighters, Local 932 v. City of Corning, 97 A.D.2d 975, 468 N.Y.S.2d 792, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20814 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

97 A.D.2d 975 (Corning Firefighters, Local 932 v. City of Corning) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related