Corniea v. Berryhill
This text of 691 F. App'x 352 (Corniea v. Berryhill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Thomas J. Corniea appeals the district court’s order affirming the Social Security Administration’s determination that he is not disabled. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and review the district court’s decision de novo. Molina v. Astrue, 674 F.3d 1104, 1110 (9th Cir. 2012). We adopt and affirm for the well-stated reasons in the district court order of May 15, 2015.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
691 F. App'x 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/corniea-v-berryhill-ca9-2017.