Cornick v. United States

Seventh Circuit

Cornick v. United States

275 F. 354, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 2239

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

DecidedApril 15, 1921

DocketNo. 2842

StatusPublished

This text of 275 F. 354 (Cornick v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cornick v. United States, 275 F. 354, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 2239 (7th Cir. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Cornick was convicted of having felonious possession of property stolen from an interstate shipment.

A study of the transcript of the evidence satisfies us that every material allegation was supported by evidence. Most of the evidence was circumstantial. Concerning the jury’s right to act on circumstantial evidence, and the respective functions of the jury, of the trial judge, and of the reviewing judges, we have stated our views in Applebaum v. United States (C. C. A.) 274 Fed. 43, herewith decided.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Cornick was convicted of having felonious possession of property stolen from an interstate shipment.

A study of the transcript of the evidence satisfies us that every material allegation was supported by evidence. Most of the evidence was circumstantial. Concerning the jury’s right to act on circumstantial evidence, and the respective functions of the jury, of the trial judge, and of the reviewing judges, we have stated our views in Applebaum v. United States (C. C. A.) 274 Fed. 43, herewith decided.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 F. 354, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 2239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cornick-v-united-states-ca7-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack