Cornicelli v. Scannell

307 A.D.2d 1006, 763 N.Y.S.2d 510, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8977
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 20, 2003
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 307 A.D.2d 1006 (Cornicelli v. Scannell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cornicelli v. Scannell, 307 A.D.2d 1006, 763 N.Y.S.2d 510, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8977 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102 to invalidate certificates of authorization purporting to designate Joseph K. Scannell, David W. Denenberg, Martha S. Offerman, and Jeffrey S. Anlyan as candidates in a primary election to be held on September 9, 2003, for the nomination of the Independence Party for the public offices of Member of the Nassau County Legislature, 5th District, Member of the Nassau County Legislature, 19th District, Town of Oyster Bay Town Clerk, and Town of North Hempstead Council Member, respectively, the petitioners appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a final order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Dunne, J.), entered August 15, 2003, as granted the motion of Joseph K. Scannell, David W. Denenberg, Martha S. Offerman, and Jeffrey S. Anlyan to dismiss the petition for failure to join a necessary party, and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the final order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Since the petition seeks to challenge the actions and authority of the Executive Committee of the Interim Committee of the Independence Party for the County of Nassau (hereinafter the Executive Committee), the Executive Committee was a necessary party to this proceeding. The petitioners’ failure to join the Executive Committee as a necessary party was jurisdictionally fatal. Therefore, the Supreme Court correctly granted the motion and dismissed the proceeding (see CPLR 1001 [a]; Matter of Barbuto v Sarcone, 275 AD2d 424 [2000]; Matter of Jenkins v Board of Elections of City of N.Y., 270 AD2d 436 [2000]; Matter of Curcio v Wolf 133 AD2d 188 [1987]). Santucci, J.P., Florio, Friedmann, Crane and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stein v. Kings County Democratic County Comm.
2022 NY Slip Op 03918 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Quis v. Putnam County Board of Elections
22 A.D.3d 585 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Flores v. Kapsis
10 A.D.3d 432 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
307 A.D.2d 1006, 763 N.Y.S.2d 510, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8977, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cornicelli-v-scannell-nyappdiv-2003.