Cornett v. Swift Coal & Timber Co.

Sixth Circuit

Cornett v. Swift Coal & Timber Co.

112 F.2d 387, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 4304

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided April 9, 1940·No. No. 8368·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case' was heard upon the transcript, briefs and argument of counsel, and it appearing that the District Court did not err in deciding that the purchaser at, a sheriff’s sale by virtue of the tax sale and deed from the sheriff takes the. land subject to liens existing at the time of sale (Hall v. Hall, 174 Ky. 356, 192 S.W. 76; Smith v. Young, 178 Ky. 376, 198 S.W. 1166; Drane v. Graves, 261 Ky. 787, 88 S.W.2d 927); and the record presenting no reversible error, it is ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the District Court entered on June 22, 1939, herein appealed from, be and the same is in all things affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case' was heard upon the transcript, briefs and argument of counsel, and it appearing that the District Court did not err in deciding that the purchaser at, a sheriff’s sale by virtue of the tax sale and deed from the sheriff takes the. land subject to liens existing at the time of sale (Hall v. Hall, 174 Ky. 356, 192 S.W. 76; Smith v. Young, 178 Ky. 376, 198 S.W. 1166; Drane v. Graves, 261 Ky. 787, 88 S.W.2d 927); and the record presenting no reversible error, it is ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the District Court entered on June 22, 1939, herein appealed from, be and the same is in all things affirmed.

Cornett v. Swift Coal & Timber Co., 112 F.2d 387, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 4304 (6th Cir. 1940).

Pincite

112 F.2d 387 (Cornett v. Swift Coal & Timber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related