Home/Court of Appeals of Texas/Cornerstone Group, Inc. v. Stone

Cornerstone Group, Inc. v. Stone

712 S.W.2d 650, 1986 Tex. App. LEXIS 8579
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cornerstone Group, Inc. v. Stone. Read the opinion of the Court — 1986 Tex. App. LEXIS 7707 →
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 23, 1986·No. No. 2-85-096-CV·Published

Opinion

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

FENDER, Chief Justice.

Appellant contends on motion for rehearing that this court “ignores the finding of the jury that a breach of contract took place_” Appellant had contended on appeal that paragraphs three, four and eight of the contract were breached. We agreed that paragraphs three and eight were or probably were breached. Concerning paragraph four, we merely agreed with the jury and their finding to special issue two that appellee “did not prevent the performance of the ... exclusive listing agreement_” This finding obviously shows that the jury found paragraph four of the contract was not breached.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cornerstone Group, Inc. v. Stone, 712 S.W.2d 650, 1986 Tex. App. LEXIS 8579 (Tex. Ct. App. 1986).

712 S.W.2d 650 (Cornerstone Group, Inc. v. Stone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.