Corners at 1700 v. Christopher Butler

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 25-12671 Document: 8-1 Date Filed: 09/25/2025 Page: 1 of 2

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-12671 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

CORNERS AT 1700, d.b.a. Corners at 1700, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

CHRISTOPHER BUTLER, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:25-cv-03521-ELR ____________________

Before NEWSOM, GRANT, and LUCK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Christopher Butler, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s order remanding his dispossessory action to state court for USCA11 Case: 25-12671 Document: 8-1 Date Filed: 09/25/2025 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 25-12671

lack of subject matter jurisdiction. That order, however, is unre- viewable on appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), (d); New v. Sports & Recreation, 114 F.3d 1092, 1096 (11th Cir. 1997) (“Cases remanded for lack of jurisdiction are immune from review even if the district court’s decision is clearly erroneous.”). Further, Butler did not in- voke 28 U.S.C. §§ 1442 or 1443 as the basis for the removal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d); BP P.L.C. v. Mayor of Balt., 593 U.S. 230, 238-39 (2021) (concluding that, because the defendants cited § 1442 in their notice of removal, the whole of the district court’s remand order was reviewable on appeal). Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction.