Corners at 1700 v. Christopher Butler

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

In the

United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 25-12671

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

CORNERS AT 1700, d.b.a. Corners at 1700, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CHRISTOPHER BUTLER, Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:25-cv-03521-ELR

____________________

Before NEWSOM, GRANT, and LUCK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Christopher Butler, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s order remanding his dispossessory action to state court for

2

2 Opinion of the Court 25-12671

lack of subject matter jurisdiction. That order, however, is unreviewable on appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), (d); New v. Sports & Recreation, 114 F.3d 1092, 1096 (11th Cir. 1997) (“Cases remanded for lack of jurisdiction are immune from review even if the district court’s decision is clearly erroneous.”). Further, Butler did not invoke 28 U.S.C. §§ 1442 or 1443 as the basis for the removal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d); BP P.L.C. v. Mayor of Balt., 593 U.S. 230, 238-39 (2021) (concluding that, because the defendants cited § 1442 in their notice of removal, the whole of the district court’s remand order was reviewable on appeal).

Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction.