Cornell v. Nix

Eighth Circuit

Cornell v. Nix

976 F.2d 376, 1992 WL 228871

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided March 6, 1992·No. No. 90-1195·Published·Cited by 42 cases

Opinion

The suggestion for rehearing en banc is granted. The opinion and judgment of the panel, previously filed, are vacated. This case is set for oral argument before the Court en banc in St. Paul, Minnesota, on Monday, May 11, 1992.

The parties are invited, though not required, to file supplemental briefs, not to exceed 15 pages, the briefs to be filed simultaneously on or before April 20, 1992.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The suggestion for rehearing en banc is granted. The opinion and judgment of the panel, previously filed, are vacated. This case is set for oral argument before the Court en banc in St. Paul, Minnesota, on Monday, May 11, 1992.

The parties are invited, though not required, to file supplemental briefs, not to exceed 15 pages, the briefs to be filed simultaneously on or before April 20, 1992.

It is so ordered.

Cornell v. Nix, 976 F.2d 376, 1992 WL 228871 (8th Cir. 1992).

Pincite

976 F.2d 376 (Cornell v. Nix) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related