Cornell v. Nix

Eighth Circuit

Cornell v. Nix

976 F.2d 376, 1992 WL 228871

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedMarch 6, 1992

DocketNo. 90-1195

StatusPublished

Cited by42 cases

This text of 976 F.2d 376 (Cornell v. Nix) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cornell v. Nix, 976 F.2d 376, 1992 WL 228871 (8th Cir. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

The suggestion for rehearing en banc is granted. The opinion and judgment of the panel, previously filed, are vacated. This case is set for oral argument before the Court en banc in St. Paul, Minnesota, on Monday, May 11, 1992.

The parties are invited, though not required, to file supplemental briefs, not to exceed 15 pages, the briefs to be filed simultaneously on or before April 20, 1992.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The suggestion for rehearing en banc is granted. The opinion and judgment of the panel, previously filed, are vacated. This case is set for oral argument before the Court en banc in St. Paul, Minnesota, on Monday, May 11, 1992.

The parties are invited, though not required, to file supplemental briefs, not to exceed 15 pages, the briefs to be filed simultaneously on or before April 20, 1992.

It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

976 F.2d 376, 1992 WL 228871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cornell-v-nix-ca8-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack