Cornell v. Hendrickson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Cornell v. Hendrickson

110 N.W. 1132, 100 Minn. 544, 1907 Minn. LEXIS 726

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedMarch 1, 1907

DocketNos. 14,961—(71)

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 110 N.W. 1132 (Cornell v. Hendrickson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cornell v. Hendrickson, 110 N.W. 1132, 100 Minn. 544, 1907 Minn. LEXIS 726 (Mich. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Action to recover damages for an alleged indecent assault, in which plaintiff had a verdict for $1,250.

The trial court granted a new trial, on the ground that the verdict was not sustained by the evidence and also that the damages were excessive, from which plaintiff appealed. The order is affirmed, under the rule of Hicks v. Stone, 13 Minn. 398 (434), and Mohr v. Williams, 95 Minn. 261, 104 N. W. 12, 1 L. R. A. (N. S.) 439.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Action to recover damages for an alleged indecent assault, in which plaintiff had a verdict for $1,250.

The trial court granted a new trial, on the ground that the verdict was not sustained by the evidence and also that the damages were excessive, from which plaintiff appealed. The order is affirmed, under the rule of Hicks v. Stone, 13 Minn. 398 (434), and Mohr v. Williams, 95 Minn. 261, 104 N. W. 12, 1 L. R. A. (N. S.) 439.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 N.W. 1132, 100 Minn. 544, 1907 Minn. LEXIS 726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cornell-v-hendrickson-minn-1907.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack