Cornell v. Hendrickson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Cornell v. Hendrickson

110 N.W. 1132, 100 Minn. 544, 1907 Minn. LEXIS 726

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided March 1, 1907·No. Nos. 14,961—(71)·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Action to recover damages for an alleged indecent assault, in which plaintiff had a verdict for $1,250.

The trial court granted a new trial, on the ground that the verdict was not sustained by the evidence and also that the damages were excessive, from which plaintiff appealed. The order is affirmed, under the rule of Hicks v. Stone, 13 Minn. 398 (434), and Mohr v. Williams, 95 Minn. 261, 104 N. W. 12, 1 L. R. A. (N. S.) 439.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Action to recover damages for an alleged indecent assault, in which plaintiff had a verdict for $1,250.

The trial court granted a new trial, on the ground that the verdict was not sustained by the evidence and also that the damages were excessive, from which plaintiff appealed. The order is affirmed, under the rule of Hicks v. Stone, 13 Minn. 398 (434), and Mohr v. Williams, 95 Minn. 261, 104 N. W. 12, 1 L. R. A. (N. S.) 439.

Order affirmed.

Cornell v. Hendrickson, 110 N.W. 1132, 100 Minn. 544, 1907 Minn. LEXIS 726 (Mich. 1907).

Pincite

110 N.W. 1132 (Cornell v. Hendrickson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related