Cornell v. Franklin

Supreme Court of Florida

Cornell v. Franklin

39 Fla. 780

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cornell v. Franklin. Read the opinion of the Court — 40 Fla. 149 →

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 15, 1897·Published

Opinion

This action was brought by the defendant in error •against the plaintiff in error and Isaac Morgan. There was judgment for the plaintiff and the defendant E. B. •Cornell takes writ of error.

, Writ of error dismissed because the judgment is a .joint one against two defendants, and the writ of error is sued out in the name of only one.

Motion to reinstate denied January 18, 1898. (See opinion 40 Fla. —, 23 South. Rep. —).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This action was brought by the defendant in error •against the plaintiff in error and Isaac Morgan. There was judgment for the plaintiff and the defendant E. B. •Cornell takes writ of error.

, Writ of error dismissed because the judgment is a .joint one against two defendants, and the writ of error is sued out in the name of only one.

Motion to reinstate denied January 18, 1898. (See opinion 40 Fla. —, 23 South. Rep. —).

Cornell v. Franklin, 39 Fla. 780 (Fla. 1897).

Pincite

39 Fla. 780 (Cornell v. Franklin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.